163, step 80032768 = 32^3-div(c^2 grad) + V2293760.0omega_bulk_min = sqrt(c2_min) * 2pi / 32 = 0.0279847 basin) = 0.073809Number of modes below the global bulk edge: 0
| mode | omega | wall_type | participation_volume | parallel_spread | perp_decay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | - | none below bulk edge | - | - | - |
0.196251 -> nearest eigenmode 0.195586 (mode 38, wall (11, 7), rel err 0.003)0.392503 -> nearest eigenmode 0.236097 (mode 100, wall (11, 7), rel err 0.398)0.745755 -> nearest eigenmode 0.236097 (mode 100, wall (11, 7), rel err 0.683)0.863506 -> nearest eigenmode 0.236097 (mode 100, wall (11, 7), rel err 0.727)The low-100 solve only covered the bottom of the spectrum. A follow-up shift-invert solve on vlam targeted the three larger probe frequencies directly on the same exact 32^3 frozen operator.
0.392503: there is a tight cluster of interior eigenmodes at 0.392240 to 0.3930100.745755: there is a tight cluster at 0.745681 to 0.7458140.863506: there is a tight cluster at 0.863457 to 0.863566So the probe peaks at 0.392, 0.746, and 0.864 are genuine interior eigenmodes of H, not transient artifacts.
The wall typing of those interior modes is:
0.392 cluster is mixed, with one compact (43,11)-dominant mode at 0.392240 (participation volume 120.6, perpendicular spread 3.95) and several broader (11,7) wall modes0.746 cluster is entirely (11,7)-dominant, broad, and wall-guided0.864 cluster is also entirely (11,7)-dominant, broad, and wall-guided0.111905, well above 0.027984.0.196 comes directly from the low-end solve, and 0.392, 0.746, 0.864 are confirmed by shift-invert on the exact operator.