Two previously computed descriptions of the local factor looked inconsistent:
the shifted coordinate relation suggested a quadratic algebra
A_k = (Z/3^k Z)[y]/(y^2 - 9u_k),
which is free of rank 2 over Z/3^k Z and therefore has size 3^(2k);
the branch/conductor model gave the actual local Hecke order R_k of size 3^(2k-1).
The resolution is simple: R_k is an index-3 suborder of the quadratic overorder A_k.
| modulus | k | size(A_k) | size(R_k) | index [A_k : R_k] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 | 3 | 729 | 243 | 3 |
| 81 | 4 | 6561 | 2187 | 3 |
| 243 | 5 | 59049 | 19683 | 3 |
| 729 | 6 | 531441 | 177147 | 3 |
The quadratic y-presentation is still useful, but it is not the integral Hecke order itself. It is a monogenic overorder sitting one F_3-dimension above the true local lattice. The conductor data shows the same index 3 gap at every tested finite level.
So the correct hierarchy is:
true local Hecke order R_k
⊂
index-3 quadratic overorder A_k = (Z/3^k Z)[y]/(y^2 - 9u_k)
⊂
split normalization (Z/3^k Z) × (Z/3^k Z).
This resolves the apparent contradiction between:
So the singular Hecke node has three nested local models:
3 glued order,y,