Richard Hoekstra Papers · Atlas · Data

Introduction

Let N=163N = 163. The space S2(Γ0(163))S_2(\Gamma_0(163)) of weight-22 cusp forms has dimension 1313. The Hecke algebra 𝕋163=𝐙[T1,T2,T3,]End(S2(Γ0(163)))\mathbb{T}_{163} = \mathbf{Z}[T_1, T_2, T_3, \ldots] \subset \mathrm{End}(S_2(\Gamma_0(163))) is a free 𝐙\mathbf{Z}-module of rank 1313. Its discriminant is disc(𝕋163)=215326565782536739.\mathrm{disc}(\mathbb{T}_{163}) = 2^{15} \cdot 3^2 \cdot 65657 \cdot 82536739. The 33-adic valuation v3(disc)=2v_3(\mathrm{disc}) = 2 signals that 𝕋163𝐙3\mathbb{T}_{163} \otimes \mathbf{Z}_3 is not a maximal order. The purpose of this paper is to give a complete description of the singular locus.

Over 𝐐3\mathbf{Q}_3, the algebra 𝕋163𝐐3\mathbb{T}_{163} \otimes \mathbf{Q}_3 splits as a product of fields corresponding to the Galois orbits of newforms. Among the 1313-dimensional space, there is a unique non-semisimple 33-adic local factor of rank 33, involving two newform branches whose Hecke eigenvalues are congruent modulo 33. We identify these branches, give the exact algebra presentation, and develop the full local theory: ideals, modules, and representations.

Context: Heegner discriminants

The number 163163 is the largest Heegner discriminant: 𝐐(163)\mathbf{Q}(\sqrt{-163}) has class number one. The seven Heegner discriminants d{3,7,11,19,43,67,163}d \in \{3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67, 163\} define Hecke operators TdT_d on S2(Γ0(163))S_2(\Gamma_0(163)). Their behaviour on the singular factor is a motivating example throughout, though our results are purely local and do not depend on the Heegner property.

Main results

Our main contributions are:

  1. An explicit presentation of the singular order (Theorem [thm:presentation]).

  2. The identification of the glued newform pair as V1V_1 (rational) and one 𝐐3\mathbf{Q}_3-factor of the degree-55 orbit, with the Atkin–Lehner eigenvalue U163=1U_{163} = -1 characterising the node (Theorem [thm:branches]).

  3. A complete ideal classification with closed-form local zeta function (Theorem [thm:ideals]).

  4. The residue representation theory: two simples, one unique non-split self-extension (Theorem [thm:residue]).

  5. A classification of all torsion-free (Cohen–Macaulay) modules: three indecomposables (Theorem [thm:CM]).

  6. The singularity category with 22-periodic suspension, Grothendieck group 𝐙/2𝐙\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}, and explicit stable Ext algebra (Theorem [thm:singcat]).

The singular order

Setup and notation

Let 𝕋=𝕋163𝐙3\mathbb{T}= \mathbb{T}_{163} \otimes \mathbf{Z}_3. The operator T2T_2 acts on the 1313-dimensional space and its characteristic polynomial factors over 𝐐3\mathbf{Q}_3 into irreducible pieces corresponding to Galois orbits of newforms. We write V1V_1 for the rational eigenform (the unique elliptic curve of conductor 163163), V5V_5 for a degree-55 orbit, V7V_7 for a degree-11 eigenform with T2T_2-eigenvalue 1-1, and the remaining dimensions for other orbits.

There exists a unique non-semisimple local factor of 𝕋\mathbb{T} of rank 33 over 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3, with $$\Osing \;\cong\; \mathbf{Z}_3\, e_7 \;\oplus\; \mathbf{Z}_3\, e_{\mathrm{pair}} \;\oplus\; \mathbf{Z}_3\, n$$ as a 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3-module, with multiplication e72=e7,epair2=epair,e7epair=0,e7n=0,epairn=n,n2=3n.e_7^2 = e_7, \quad e_{\mathrm{pair}}^2 = e_{\mathrm{pair}}, \quad e_7 e_{\mathrm{pair}} = 0, \quad e_7 n = 0, \quad e_{\mathrm{pair}}\, n = n, \quad n^2 = 3n. Equivalently, $$\Osing \;\cong\; \mathbf{Z}_3 \times \mathbf{Z}_3[\eta]/(\eta^2 - 3\eta),$$ where the first factor corresponds to the split branch V7V_7 and the pair factor $$\Rpair \;=\; \mathbf{Z}_3[\eta]/(\eta^2 - 3\eta)$$ carries the glued branches V1V_1 and V5V_5.

Proof. Computed by lifting the mod-33 idempotent from T3T_3 and verifying the relations modulo 3k3^k for k=3,4,5,6k = 3, 4, 5, 6 (i.e., modulo 27,81,243,72927, 81, 243, 729). The suborder generated by T1,,T13T_1, \ldots, T_{13} has index 1388=223471388 = 2^2 \cdot 347 in the full Hecke order, which is prime to 33, so it determines the same 33-adic local factor. ◻

The relation η2=3η\eta^2 = 3\eta encodes the full node. Factoring: η(η3)=0\eta(\eta - 3) = 0, so η\eta has eigenvalues 00 and 33 in the normalisation 𝐙3×𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3 \times \mathbf{Z}_3. Modulo 33, both eigenvalues are zero: this is the collision. Over 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3, they separate.

The congruence-order model

The pair factor admits the congruence description $$\Rpair \;\cong\; \{(a,b) \in \mathbf{Z}_3 \times \mathbf{Z}_3 : a \equiv b \pmod{3}\},$$ via η(0,3)\eta \mapsto (0, 3). The normalisation is R̃=𝐙3×𝐙3\widetilde{R} = \mathbf{Z}_3 \times \mathbf{Z}_3, the conductor is $\mathfrak{f} = 3\mathbf{Z}_3 \times 3\mathbf{Z}_3 = \m$, and the normalisation defect $\widetilde{R}/\Rpair$ has 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3-length 11.

Proof. The map 1(1,1)1 \mapsto (1,1), η(0,3)\eta \mapsto (0,3) is an injective ring homomorphism whose image is exactly the pairs congruent modulo 33. The conductor computation is direct. ◻

The full singular order

The full singular order is $$\Osing \;\cong\; \{(x_7, x_1, x_5) \in \mathbf{Z}_3^3 : x_1 \equiv x_5 \pmod{3}\},$$ where x7x_7 is the V7V_7-coordinate and (x1,x5)(x_1, x_5) are the V1V_1- and V5V_5-coordinates.

Branch identification

The glued pair consists of:

  1. V1V_1: the rational newform (the elliptic curve E/𝐐E/\mathbf{Q} of conductor 163163), with Atkin–Lehner eigenvalue U163=1U_{163} = -1.

  2. V5V_5: one 𝐐3\mathbf{Q}_3-factor of the degree-55 Galois orbit, also with U163=1U_{163} = -1.

The split branch is V7V_7, with U163=+1U_{163} = +1. Modulo 33, the Hecke eigenvalues of V1V_1 and V5V_5 are identical on all operators. Modulo 99, they separate: T11(V1)6T_{11}(V_1) \equiv -6 and T11(V5)6(mod27)T_{11}(V_5) \equiv 6 \pmod{27}.

Proof. Computed from the qq-expansions of all newforms of level 163163, reduced modulo successive powers of 33. ◻

The Atkin–Lehner involution W163W_{163} separates the node (U163=1U_{163} = -1) from the split branch (U163=+1U_{163} = +1). The Heegner operators on the syndrome take the values shown in Table 1.

Heegner operator eigenvalues on the three branches (mod 27 for T11T_{11}).
V1V_1 V5V_5 V7V_7
T3T_3 EE EE EE
T11T_{11} 6-6 +6+6
T163T_{163} 1-1 1-1 +1+1

Geometry of the node

The Jacobson radical

The Jacobson radical of $\Osing$ is J=(3e7,3epair,n),J = (3 e_7,\; 3 e_{\mathrm{pair}},\; n), and its powers are Jr=𝐙33re7𝐙33repair𝐙33r1n,r1.J^r = \mathbf{Z}_3 \cdot 3^r e_7 \;\oplus\; \mathbf{Z}_3 \cdot 3^r e_{\mathrm{pair}} \;\oplus\; \mathbf{Z}_3 \cdot 3^{r-1} n, \qquad r \ge 1. In particular:

  1. $\Osing / J \cong \mathbf{F}_3 \times \mathbf{F}_3$ is two-dimensional semisimple.

  2. $J / 3\Osing$ is one-dimensional: the nilpotent shadow.

  3. $\Osing / 3\Osing \cong \mathbf{F}_3 \times \mathbf{F}_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)$ is three-dimensional.

  4. dim𝐅3(Jr/Jr+1)=3\dim_{\mathbf{F}_3}(J^r / J^{r+1}) = 3 for all r1r \ge 1.

The tangent cone

The associated graded ring of $\Rpair$ with respect to $\m = (3, \eta)$ is $$\gr_\m(\Rpair) \;\cong\; \mathbf{F}_3[a, g]/(g^2 - ag) \;=\; \mathbf{F}_3[a,g]/(g(g-a)).$$ This is the coordinate ring of two lines crossing at the origin in the affine plane over 𝐅3\mathbf{F}_3.

Proof. In $\Rpair$, write a\bar{a} for the image of 33 and g\bar{g} for the image of η\eta in $\m/\m^2$. Then η2=3η\eta^2 = 3\eta gives g2=ag\bar{g}^2 = \bar{a}\bar{g}, i.e., g(ga)=0\bar{g}(\bar{g} - \bar{a}) = 0. ◻

The spectrum $\Spec(\Rpair)$ is a split nodal curve over 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3: two smooth branches meeting transversally at the closed point. This is the geometric content of η(η3)=0\eta(\eta - 3) = 0.

The syndrome algebra

The residue algebra $\Osing / 3\Osing$ is A=𝐅3×𝐅3[ε]/(ε2),A \;=\; \mathbf{F}_3 \times \mathbf{F}_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2), with ε=ηmod3\varepsilon = \eta \bmod 3. Writing I=e7+epairI = e_7 + e_{\mathrm{pair}}, E=e7E = e_7, N=nmod3N = -n \bmod 3, the syndrome relations are E2=E,N2=0,EN=NE=0,E^2 = E, \quad N^2 = 0, \quad EN = NE = 0, and the Heegner operators descend as 3T3=E,T19=E,T11=N,T7=I+N,T43=T67=I+EN,T163=IE.\begin{aligned} {3} T_3 &= E, &\qquad T_{19} &= -E, \\ T_{11} &= N, &\qquad T_7 &= -I + N, \\ T_{43} &= T_{67} = I + E - N, &\qquad T_{163} &= -I - E. \end{aligned}

The canonical collision T43T67(mod3)T_{43} \equiv T_{67} \pmod{3} is a first-order phenomenon: these operators already differ modulo 99. The algebra AA forces the collision, since both must map to the same element of the three-dimensional residue ring.

Ideal classification and local zeta function

Let $R_k = \Rpair / 3^k \Rpair$ for k1k \ge 1.

  1. Each graded piece $\m^r / \m^{r+1} \cong \mathbf{F}_3^2$ for all r1r \ge 1.

  2. Between $\m^{r+1}$ and $\m^r$ in RkR_k there are exactly four intermediate ideals, indexed by 𝐏1(𝐅3)\mathbf{P}^1(\mathbf{F}_3), with generators (3r,0),(3r,3r),(3r,3r),(0,3r)(3^r, 0),\quad (3^r, 3^r),\quad (3^r, -3^r),\quad (0, 3^r) in the congruence model.

  3. The total number of ideals of RkR_k is 5k35k - 3.

  4. For the full singular order, every ideal of $\Osing / 3^k \Osing$ splits uniquely as 3a𝐙3×Ipair3^a \mathbf{Z}_3 \times I_{\mathrm{pair}}, giving (k+1)(5k3)(k+1)(5k-3) ideals in total.

The Solomon zeta functions are $$\zeta_{\Rpair}(s) = \frac{1 + x + 3x^2}{1 - x^2}, \qquad \zeta_{\Osing}(s) = \frac{1 + x + 3x^2}{(1-x)(1-x^2)}, \quad x = 3^{-s}.$$

Residue representation theory

The residue algebra A=𝐅3×𝐅3[ε]/(ε2)A = \mathbf{F}_3 \times \mathbf{F}_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2) has exactly two simple modules:

  1. χV7\chi_{V7}: the character E1E \mapsto 1, N0N \mapsto 0.

  2. χpair\chi_{\mathrm{pair}}: the character E0E \mapsto 0, N0N \mapsto 0.

The regular module decomposes as $$A_{\mathrm{reg}} \;\cong\; \chi_{V7} \;\oplus\; \Ppair,$$ where $\Ppair$ is the unique non-split self-extension of χpair\chi_{\mathrm{pair}}: $$0 \to \chi_{\mathrm{pair}} \to \Ppair \to \chi_{\mathrm{pair}} \to 0.$$ The extension table is $$\Ext^1(\chi_{\mathrm{pair}}, \chi_{\mathrm{pair}}) \cong \mathbf{F}_3, \qquad \Ext^1(\chi_{V7}, -) = \Ext^1(-, \chi_{V7}) = 0.$$ In particular, the branch V7V_7 admits no residue-level extension to or from the glued block.

Cohen–Macaulay module classification

The category of torsion-free (Cohen–Macaulay) modules over $\Rpair$ has finite representation type. The indecomposable objects are exactly:

  1. $B_0 = \Rpair / (\eta) \cong \mathbf{Z}_3$, with η\eta acting as 00 (branch V1V_1).

  2. $B_3 = \Rpair / (\eta - 3) \cong \mathbf{Z}_3$, with η\eta acting as 33 (branch V5V_5).

  3. $\Rpair$ itself (the node), of 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3-rank 22.

Every torsion-free $\Rpair$-module is isomorphic to $$B_0^u \;\oplus\; \Rpair^c \;\oplus\; B_3^v$$ for unique u,c,v0u, c, v \ge 0.

Proof. A torsion-free $\Rpair$-module MM of rank (a,b)(a,b) over the normalisation 𝐙3×𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3 \times \mathbf{Z}_3 determines a gluing subspace W𝐅3a𝐅3bW \;\subset\; \mathbf{F}_3^a \oplus \mathbf{F}_3^b given by the image of $M / \m M$ in (𝐙3a𝐙3b)/3(𝐙3a𝐙3b)(\mathbf{Z}_3^a \oplus \mathbf{Z}_3^b) / 3(\mathbf{Z}_3^a \oplus \mathbf{Z}_3^b). Every such subspace decomposes uniquely as W=K0ΔcK3,W = K_0 \oplus \Delta^c \oplus K_3, where K0𝐅3a0K_0 \subset \mathbf{F}_3^a \oplus 0 is a left kernel, K30𝐅3bK_3 \subset 0 \oplus \mathbf{F}_3^b is a right kernel, and Δc\Delta^c is the diagonal (the cc paired coordinates glued at residue level). This forces $$M \;\cong\; B_0^{|K_0|} \;\oplus\; \Rpair^c \;\oplus\; B_3^{|K_3|}.$$ For rank 22, the only indecomposable gluing space is the diagonal Δ𝐅3𝐅3\Delta \subset \mathbf{F}_3 \oplus \mathbf{F}_3, giving $\Rpair$. All other rank-22 gluings split as B0B3B_0 \oplus B_3. The argument extends to arbitrary rank by the same diagonal decomposition. ◻

The three indecomposables have a natural interpretation: B0B_0 and B3B_3 are the two branches of the node, and $\Rpair$ is the node itself — the unique indecomposable that “sees” both branches simultaneously. The category is of finite type precisely because $\Rpair$ is a Bass order (a Gorenstein order in a commutative semisimple algebra of dimension 22).

Fundamental exact sequences

The two branch modules are linked by the node:

There are two fundamental short exact sequences of $\Rpair$-modules: $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:ses1} 0 \to B_3 \xrightarrow{\;\iota_3\;} \Rpair \xrightarrow{\;\pi_0\;} B_0 \to 0, \\ \label{eq:ses2} 0 \to B_0 \xrightarrow{\;\iota_0\;} \Rpair \xrightarrow{\;\pi_3\;} B_3 \to 0, \end{aligned}$$ where in [eq:ses1], ι3\iota_3 maps 1η1 \mapsto \eta and π0\pi_0 is projection modulo (η)(\eta); in [eq:ses2], ι0\iota_0 maps 1η31 \mapsto \eta - 3 and π3\pi_3 is projection modulo (η3)(\eta - 3).

Proof. Direct verification using η(η3)=0\eta(\eta - 3) = 0. ◻

The singularity category

In the singularity category $D_{\mathrm{sg}}(\Rpair) = \underline{\CM}(\Rpair)$, the free module $\Rpair$ becomes zero. What remains is the minimal non-trivial structure.

The singularity category $D_{\mathrm{sg}}(\Rpair)$ has exactly two indecomposable objects, B0B_0 and B3B_3, with the suspension functor acting as Σ(B0)=B3,Σ(B3)=B0,Σ2=Id.\Sigma(B_0) = B_3, \qquad \Sigma(B_3) = B_0, \qquad \Sigma^2 = \mathrm{Id}. The Auslander–Reiten quiver is B0B3B_0 \;\leftrightarrow\; B_3 with the AR translation swapping the two vertices. The Grothendieck group is $$K_0(D_{\mathrm{sg}}(\Rpair)) \;\cong\; \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}.$$

Proof. The suspension Σ(B0)\Sigma(B_0) is computed from the exact sequence [eq:ses1]: the syzygy of B0B_0 is ker(π0)=B3\ker(\pi_0) = B_3. Similarly, Σ(B3)=B0\Sigma(B_3) = B_0 from [eq:ses2]. Thus Σ2=Id\Sigma^2 = \mathrm{Id} and the category is 22-periodic. Since $[B_0] + [B_3] = [\Rpair] = 0$ in K0(Dsg)K_0(D_{\mathrm{sg}}) and [B0]=[B3]0[B_0] = -[B_3] \ne 0, we get K0𝐙/2𝐙K_0 \cong \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z} generated by [B0][B_0]. ◻

The stable Ext algebra

The stable Ext algebra of $D_{\mathrm{sg}}(\Rpair)$ is generated by:

  1. two odd generators $x \in \underline{\Ext}^1(B_0, B_3)$ and $y \in \underline{\Ext}^1(B_3, B_0)$, corresponding to the extension classes of [eq:ses1] and [eq:ses2];

  2. one even periodicity class uu of degree 22, with yx=ue0yx = u \cdot e_0 and xy=ue3xy = u \cdot e_3.

This is the path algebra of the double arrow B0B3B_0 \rightrightarrows B_3 modulo the relation that the two compositions are the respective identity multiples.

The 22-periodicity is intrinsic to the node: it is the homological manifestation of the two branches exchanging roles under syzygies. After modding out the smooth directions (both the free module $\Rpair$ and the split V7V_7 branch), the Hecke singularity reduces to a single bit of information: K0𝐙/2𝐙K_0 \cong \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}, the minimal non-trivial decategorification.

The Heegner operators in the local presentation

Using the identification I=e7+epairI = e_7 + e_{\mathrm{pair}}, E=e7E = e_7, N=nN = -n, the Heegner operators act on $\Osing$ as the following elements of $\mathbf{Z}_3 \times \Rpair$:

Operator Syndrome (mod 33) Exact form in $\Osing$
T3T_3 EE e7e_7
T19T_{19} E-E e7-e_7
T11T_{11} NN n-n
T7T_7 I+N-I + N (e7+epair)n-(e_7 + e_{\mathrm{pair}}) - n
T43T_{43} I+ENI + E - N T67(mod3)\equiv T_{67} \pmod{3}, split mod 99
T67T_{67} I+ENI + E - N T43(mod3)\equiv T_{43} \pmod{3}, split mod 99
T163T_{163} IE-I - E (e7+epair)e7=2e7epair-(e_7 + e_{\mathrm{pair}}) - e_7 = -2e_7 - e_{\mathrm{pair}}

The operator T11T_{11} is the local generator of the nilpotent direction: it maps to η\eta (up to sign and unit) in the pair factor. The collision T43T67(mod3)T_{43} \equiv T_{67} \pmod{3} is forced by the residue algebra and splits at the first 33-adic thickening. The operator T163T_{163} acts as 1-1 on both branches of the node, consistent with the Atkin–Lehner eigenvalue U163=1U_{163} = -1.

Family context

A scan of levels N199N \le 199 shows that levels 4343 and 6767 (the other large Heegner class-number-one discriminants) have trivial mod-33 syndrome quotient: ker(T22)=0\ker(T_2^2) = 0 over 𝐅3\mathbf{F}_3. Level 163163 is the first class-number-one level with a genuine three-dimensional syndrome quotient. The singular node described in this paper is therefore specific to level 163163 within the class-number-one family, though similar nodal structures can occur at other levels and primes.

Summary

The singular 33-adic Hecke factor at level 163163 is completely described by one relation: η2=3η\eta^2 = 3\eta. From this single quadratic identity over 𝐙3\mathbf{Z}_3, we derived:

  1. the congruence-order model {(a,b)𝐙32:ab(mod3)}\{(a,b) \in \mathbf{Z}_3^2 : a \equiv b \pmod{3}\};

  2. the nodal geometry with tangent cone g(ga)=0g(g-a) = 0;

  3. the Jacobson filtration of constant width 33;

  4. the syndrome algebra 𝐅3×𝐅3[ε]/(ε2)\mathbf{F}_3 \times \mathbf{F}_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2) as exact mod-33 shadow;

  5. the 𝐏1(𝐅3)\mathbf{P}^1(\mathbf{F}_3)-bouquet of ideals at each depth;

  6. the local zeta function (1+x+3x2)/(1x2)(1 + x + 3x^2)/(1 - x^2);

  7. the residue Ext table with $\Ext^1(\chi_{\mathrm{pair}}, \chi_{\mathrm{pair}}) \cong \mathbf{F}_3$ as the unique non-semisimple direction;

  8. the three CM indecomposables B0B_0, $\Rpair$, B3B_3 constituting the full module category;

  9. the singularity category $D_{\mathrm{sg}}(\Rpair)$ with two objects, 22-periodic suspension, and K0𝐙/2𝐙K_0 \cong \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z};

  10. the explicit Heegner operator images confirming the T43/T67T_{43}/T_{67} collision and T11T_{11} as local generator.

The object is a two-state semisimple skeleton plus one nilpotent shadow, giving a three-state residue core with infinite 33-adic refinement of constant width 33. In the singularity category, even this reduces further: one bit, two branches, period 22.

Computational verification. All results were verified in SageMath at precision 36=7293^6 = 729 using the full integral Hecke algebra at level 163163. The explicit data are recorded in Appendix 12.

Computational data

We record the exact computational inputs underlying the main theorems.

A.1. Characteristic polynomial of T2T_2

Over 𝐙\mathbf{Z}, the characteristic polynomial of T2T_2 on the integral modular-symbols space Symb1(Γ0(163),𝐙)\mathrm{Symb}^1(\Gamma_0(163),\mathbf{Z}) factors as χT2(x)=x(x5+5x4+3x315x216x+3)(x73x65x5+19x423x2+4x+6).\chi_{T_2}(x) = x \cdot (x^5 + 5x^4 + 3x^3 - 15x^2 - 16x + 3) \cdot (x^7 - 3x^6 - 5x^5 + 19x^4 - 23x^2 + 4x + 6). The three factors correspond to the Galois orbits V1V_1 (degree 11), V5V_5 (degree 55), and V7V_7 (degree 77), with 1+5+7=13=dimV1+5+7=13=\dim V.

Modulo 33: χT2(x)x3(x4+2x3+2)(x6+x4+x3+x+1)(mod3).\chi_{T_2}(x) \equiv x^3(x^4+2x^3+2)(x^6+x^4+x^3+x+1) \pmod{3}. The x2x^2-primary component is Q=ker(T22)Q = \ker(T_2^2), of dimension 33.

A.2. Restricted Hecke matrices on QQ

In the adapted basis of Q=ker(T22)V𝐅3Q = \ker(T_2^2) \subset V_{\mathbf{F}_3}, the seven Heegner operators act as the following 3×33\times 3 matrices over 𝐅3\mathbf{F}_3: T2|Q=(000000020),T3|Q=(100000000),T7|Q=(200020022),T_2|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}0&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&2&0\end{pmatrix}, \quad T_3|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}, \quad T_7|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}2&0&0\\0&2&0\\0&2&2\end{pmatrix}, T11|Q=(000000020),T19|Q=(200000000),T_{11}|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}0&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&2&0\end{pmatrix}, \quad T_{19}|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}2&0&0\\0&0&0\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}, T43|Q=T67|Q=(200010011),T163|Q=(100020002).T_{43}|_Q = T_{67}|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}2&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&1&1\end{pmatrix}, \quad T_{163}|_Q = \begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\0&2&0\\0&0&2\end{pmatrix}. One verifies directly that T2|Q=T11|QT_2|_Q = T_{11}|_Q, that (T3|Q)2=T3|Q(T_3|_Q)^2 = T_3|_Q, (T11|Q)2=0(T_{11}|_Q)^2 = 0, and T3|QT11|Q=0T_3|_Q \cdot T_{11}|_Q = 0.

A.3. The 33-adic lift

Expressing the Heegner operators in the basis (1,T3,T11)(1, T_3, T_{11}) of AHA_H and lifting from 𝐅3\mathbf{F}_3 to 𝐙/27𝐙\mathbf{Z}/27\mathbf{Z}:

dd mod3\bmod\; 3 mod9\bmod\; 9 mod27\bmod\; 27
33 (0,1,0)(0,1,0) (0,1,0)(0,1,0) (0,1,0)(0,1,0)
77 (2,0,1)(2,0,1) (8,6,1)(8,6,1) (8,24,10)(8,24,10)
1111 (0,0,1)(0,0,1) (0,0,1)(0,0,1) (0,0,1)(0,0,1)
1919 (0,2,0)(0,2,0) (3,2,3)(3,2,3) (12,20,3)(12,20,3)
4343 (1,1,2)(1,1,2) (1,7,5)(1,7,5) (10,7,5)(10,7,5)
6767 (1,1,2)(1,1,2) (1,4,8)(1,4,8) (19,22,26)(19,22,26)
163163 (2,2,0)(2,2,0) (8,5,6)(8,5,6) (8,14,24)(8,14,24)

The collision T43T67(mod3)T_{43} \equiv T_{67} \pmod{3} is visible in the first column. The two operators separate modulo 99: the T11T_{11}-coefficients are 55 and 88 respectively. This separation is the 33-adic manifestation of the nilpotent direction η\eta in the pair factor R=𝐙3[η]/(η23η)R = \mathbf{Z}_3[\eta]/(\eta^2-3\eta).

A.4. Trace form on QQ

On the 33-dimensional algebra AH=Span𝐅3{I,E,N}A_H = \mathrm{Span}_{\mathbf{F}_3}\{I, E, N\}: Tr(I2|Q)=30(mod3),Tr(E2|Q)=1,Tr(IE|Q)=1.\operatorname{Tr}(I^2|_Q) = 3 \equiv 0 \pmod{3}, \qquad \operatorname{Tr}(E^2|_Q) = 1, \qquad \operatorname{Tr}(IE|_Q) = 1. In particular, Tr(NX|Q)=0\operatorname{Tr}(N \cdot X|_Q) = 0 for all XAHX \in A_H, confirming that the nilpotent direction lies in the radical of the trace form (rank 22).

99

B. Mazur, Modular curves and the Eisenstein ideal, Publ. Math. IHES 47 (1977), 33–186.

K. Ribet and W. Stein, Lectures on modular forms and Hecke operators, https://wstein.org/books/ribet-stein/.

Y. A. Drozd and V. V. Kirichenko, Finite dimensional algebras, Springer, 1994.

G.-M. Greuel and H. Knörrer, Einfache Kurvensingularitäten und torsionsfreie Moduln, Math. Ann. 270 (1985), 417–425.

H. Bass, On the ubiquity of Gorenstein rings, Math. Z. 82 (1963), 8–28.

F. Calegari and D. Geraghty, Modularity lifting beyond the Taylor–Wiles method, Invent. Math. 211 (2018), 297–433.

R.-O. Buchweitz, Maximal Cohen–Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology over Gorenstein rings, unpublished manuscript (1986), published posthumously, Math. Surveys Monogr. 262, AMS, 2021.