Richard Hoekstra Papers · Atlas · Data

Introduction

At level N=163N=163, the cuspidal modular-symbols space V=S2(Γ0(163))V = S_2(\Gamma_0(163)) has dimension 1313 over 𝐐\mathbf Q. The integral modular-symbols lattice V𝐙VV_{\mathbf Z}\subset V is preserved by all Hecke operators. Reducing modulo 33 gives a 1313-dimensional 𝐅3\mathbf F_3-vector space V𝐅3=V𝐙/3V𝐙V_{\mathbf F_3}=V_{\mathbf Z}/3V_{\mathbf Z} with commuting Hecke operators.

Earlier computations in this project established two separate mod-33 phenomena:

  1. a canonical Hecke-stable decomposition $$V_{\mathbf F_3} = \kerop(T_2^2)\oplus \operatorname{im}(T_2^2)$$ of dimensions 3+103+10;

  2. a noncanonical discrete-log construction producing a weight-55 codeword in the ternary Hamming code.

The second construction depends on a choice of primitive root modulo 163163 and therefore does not give a canonical bridge between the Hecke module and the Hamming code. The purpose of this note is to record the strongest canonical bridge presently known: the action of the Heegner operators on the canonical 33-dimensional summand.

The canonical Hecke-stable summand

Let V𝐅3V_{\mathbf F_3} be the mod-33 reduction of the cuspidal modular-symbols space at level 163163. Then $$\dim \kerop(T_2^2)=3,\qquad \dim \operatorname{im}(T_2^2)=10,$$ and $$V_{\mathbf F_3}=\kerop(T_2^2)\oplus \operatorname{im}(T_2^2).$$ Since every Hecke operator commutes with T2T_2, both summands are Hecke-stable.

Proof. Modulo 33, the characteristic polynomial of T2T_2 factors as χT2(x)=x3(x4+2x3+2)(x6+x4+x3+x+1).\chi_{T_2}(x)=x^3(x^4+2x^3+2)(x^6+x^4+x^3+x+1). The three factors are pairwise coprime in 𝐅3[x]\mathbf F_3[x], so primary decomposition gives V𝐅3=Vx2Vx4+2x3+2Vx6+x4+x3+x+1,V_{\mathbf F_3}=V_{x^2}\oplus V_{x^4+2x^3+2}\oplus V_{x^6+x^4+x^3+x+1}, with dimensions 33, 44, and 66 respectively. Since $\kerop(T_2^2)=V_{x^2}$ has dimension 33 and im(T22)\operatorname{im}(T_2^2) is the complementary summand of dimension 1010, the result follows. ◻

Set $$Q:=\kerop(T_2^2)\subset V_{\mathbf F_3}.$$ Then QQ is a 33-dimensional Hecke-stable direct summand of V𝐅3V_{\mathbf F_3}.

The summand QQ is canonical in the following sense: it is the x2x^2-primary component of T2T_2 acting on V𝐅3V_{\mathbf F_3}. The choice of T2T_2 as the splitting operator is natural since 22 is the smallest prime not dividing the level. However, the same 33-dimensional summand arises as a Hecke-stable piece for any operator whose mod-33 reduction separates the three primary components.

The Heegner syndrome algebra

Let ={3,7,11,19,43,67,163}\mathcal H = \{3,7,11,19,43,67,163\} be the Heegner operator set at level 163163.

The restricted Heegner operators Td|QEnd𝐅3(Q),d,T_d|_Q \in \operatorname{End}_{\mathbf F_3}(Q), \qquad d\in\mathcal H, span a 33-dimensional commutative algebra AQEnd(Q)A_Q\subset \operatorname{End}(Q).

More precisely, with I=IdQ,E=T3|Q,N=T11|Q,I = \mathrm{Id}_Q,\qquad E = T_3|_Q,\qquad N = T_{11}|_Q, one has E2=E,N2=0,EN=NE=0,E^2 = E,\qquad N^2=0,\qquad EN = NE = 0, and the Heegner operators satisfy T3|Q=E,T19|Q=E,T11|Q=N,T7|Q=I+N,T43|Q=T67|Q=I+EN,T163|Q=IE.\begin{aligned} T_3|_Q &= E,\\ T_{19}|_Q &= -E,\\ T_{11}|_Q &= N,\\ T_7|_Q &= -I + N,\\ T_{43}|_Q &= T_{67}|_Q = I + E - N,\\ T_{163}|_Q &= -I - E. \end{aligned} In particular, AQ=Span𝐅3{I,E,N},A_Q = \operatorname{Span}_{\mathbf F_3}\{I,E,N\}, and AQA_Q is generated by one idempotent and one orthogonal nilpotent.

Proof. The matrices were computed explicitly on QQ in an adapted modular-symbols basis. Direct multiplication gives the stated relations. Since all seven Heegner operators are linear combinations of I,E,NI,E,N, the span has dimension at most 33. Since I,E,NI,E,N are linearly independent, the dimension is exactly 33. ◻

The syndrome algebra is isomorphic to AQ𝐅3×𝐅3[ε]/(ε2).A_Q \cong \mathbf F_3 \times \mathbf F_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2).

Proof. Put F=IEF=I-E. Then E2=E,F2=F,EF=FE=0,FN=NF=N.E^2=E,\qquad F^2=F,\qquad EF=FE=0,\qquad FN=NF=N. Thus EE spans a copy of 𝐅3\mathbf F_3, while (F,N)(F,N) spans the dual-number algebra 𝐅3[ε]/(ε2)\mathbf F_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2) with ε\varepsilon corresponding to NN. ◻

The canonical collision T43|Q=T67|QT_{43}|_Q = T_{67}|_Q is exact. This is the strongest base-free identification between Heegner labels currently visible on the mod-33 side.

The quotient trace form

Define the quotient trace form on \mathcal H by GQ(d,d)=Tr(TdTd|Q).G_Q(d,d') = \operatorname{Tr}(T_d T_{d'}|_Q). Then GQG_Q has rank 22.

Proof. In the commutative algebra AQA_Q, multiplication by the nilpotent element NN is a nilpotent endomorphism: its only eigenvalue is 00, so Tr(NX)=0\operatorname{Tr}(NX)=0 for all XAQX\in A_Q. Hence the NN-line lies in the radical of the trace form, and the trace form on AQA_Q has rank at most 22. The explicit values Tr(I2|Q)=30\operatorname{Tr}(I^2|_Q)=3\equiv 0, Tr(E2|Q)=1\operatorname{Tr}(E^2|_Q)=1, Tr(IE|Q)=1\operatorname{Tr}(IE|_Q)=1 show the rank is exactly 22 over 𝐅3\mathbf F_3. ◻

Thus the quotient retains a 33-dimensional Hecke algebra but only a 22-dimensional trace geometry. The nilpotent direction survives algebraically but is invisible to trace.

The projective unit group

The unit group of AQA_Q has 1212 elements, and its projectivization modulo scalar units is cyclic of order 66: AQ×/𝐅3×C6.A_Q^\times/\mathbf F_3^\times \cong C_6. The invertible Heegner operators T7|QT_7|_Q, T43|QT_{43}|_Q, T67|QT_{67}|_Q, and T163|QT_{163}|_Q generate the full projective unit group.

Proof. From Corollary [cor:structure], AQ×𝐅3××(𝐅3[ε]/(ε2))×.A_Q^\times \cong \mathbf F_3^\times \times \bigl(\mathbf F_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)\bigr)^\times. Now 𝐅3×\mathbf F_3^\times has order 22, while (𝐅3[ε]/(ε2))×𝐅3××(1+ε𝐅3)C2×C3C6.\bigl(\mathbf F_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2)\bigr)^\times \cong \mathbf F_3^\times \times (1+\varepsilon\mathbf F_3) \cong C_2\times C_3 \cong C_6. Hence |AQ×|=26=12|A_Q^\times| = 2\cdot 6 = 12, and modding out by scalar units gives a group of order 66, necessarily isomorphic to C6C_6.

The explicit projective permutations induced by the invertible Heegner operators have orders |T7|=3,|T43|=|T67|=6,|T163|=2,|T_7|=3,\qquad |T_{43}|=|T_{67}|=6,\qquad |T_{163}|=2, and the subgroup they generate has order 66. Therefore it is the full projective unit group. ◻

The projective action of AQ×/𝐅3×A_Q^\times/\mathbf F_3^\times on the 1313 points of 𝐏(Q)\mathbf P(Q) has orbit sizes 1+1+2+3+6.1+1+2+3+6.

Proof. Direct computation of the projective unit action on 𝐏(Q)\mathbf P(Q). ◻

This explains the previously observed order-66 projective Hecke group exactly: it is the full projectivized unit group of the syndrome algebra, not an accidental subgroup of PGL(3,3)\operatorname{PGL}(3,3).

Family context

Among the class-number-one prime levels 19,43,67,163,19,\ 43,\ 67,\ 163, the dimensions of the canonical mod-33 quotient $Q_N=\kerop(T_2^2)$ are 1,0,0,31,\ 0,\ 0,\ 3 respectively. Thus 163163 is the first class-number-one level with a genuinely 33-dimensional syndrome quotient.

Proof. Direct computation in SageMath. ◻

The phenomenon is not globally unique: other prime levels up to 199199 also have nontrivial QNQ_N. What is special within the class-number-one family is the first appearance of the full 33-dimensional syndrome space.

Discussion

The canonical object on the mod-33 side is not a seven-point configuration in 𝐏2(𝐅3)\mathbf P^2(\mathbf F_3). The seven Heegner primes do not canonically embed there. What is canonical is stronger in a different direction:

  1. the Hecke module has a canonical 10+310+3 split modulo 33;

  2. the Heegner operators descend to a 33-dimensional algebra on the quotient;

  3. that algebra has an explicit structure 𝐅3×𝐅3[ε]/(ε2);\mathbf F_3 \times \mathbf F_3[\varepsilon]/(\varepsilon^2);

  4. its projective unit group is exactly the order-66 Hecke symmetry seen in earlier computations, with orbit decomposition 1+1+2+3+61+1+2+3+6 on 𝐏(Q)\mathbf P(Q).

So the Hamming–Hecke bridge that survives canonically is not a point-set bridge but an algebra-and-group bridge.

Acknowledgements

Computations were carried out in SageMath.

9

T. Miyake, Modular Forms, Springer, 1989.

The Sage Developers, SageMath, the Sage Mathematics Software System, https://www.sagemath.org.